Mind vs Heart
Emotions tear us apart…Thoughts stitch together all those torn pieces; is it this way or the other way round?? Control your feelings or control your thoughts!!! Is there an answer to these questions, is the answer universal or is it subjective?? According to me, each individual has his own priorities and a point of view.
Many of us would like to do everything based on instincts, without planning anything. For them, planning and thinking just squeezes out the fun from their lives, split second decisions make life adventurous and more enjoyable. For others (including me), life is not that easy and it’s not a game without any odds. Everything need to be well structured, each decision should have a logical reason behind it (in that sense, even writing a blog).
For some, it’s a tough battle between the two forces and if this battle continues for long, it drains the soul out of the person and makes him feel the worst, as if a ‘Dementor’ is sucking his soul. Rarely do we find Heart and Mind work together, blend together to provide their master- the extreme happiness.
I feel that others may also be faced with these questions, but I am damn sure that a duel between ‘my’ ‘heart’ and ‘mind’ goes on each and everyday, may be for less time but I can never overlook or ignore the existence of this duel. As far as I am concerned, I go for my mind’s decision which seems to me more rational and beneficial. It seems to me that those who take decisions based on instincts lack the power of thinking rationally or don’t understand the pros and cons of an issue. Rather, when they say that taking decisions based on instincts has proved better in their past, than the other way; I see no reason to it. A thought instantly pops up, “note it’s a thought and not a feeling”, ‘how can one just forget the basis of this “modern world”, the basic principle that distinguishes us from 'the medieval - the Dark Ages', the principle of Renaissance - to ask questions, to be inquisitive, to be rational.’ Do those “hearty” people mean that we have developed and evolved because we know what our heart says, while our ancestors in medieval ages never knew that a thing like heart ever existed.
I would like to ponder upon some of the daily life issues, that I have noticed. For example, have you ever seen a person meditating, and asked him its benefit. According to me, a person who sits in silence and concentrate to just improve his mind power, does do justice to the art. But, I want to bring those to the fore who meditate for the purpose of ’salvation’ as they say, to make their souls pure. They say, “meditating means focusing on a thought or ‘nil’(nothing) OR even ‘Totally empty your mind’. Concentration would develop your soul, make your ‘heart’ light and remove the burden on it. It will make your heart ‘pure’.” I don’t understand, how a mind exercise would help heart when both are seperate entities, or even if not, then it’s always asked to control one’s mind; because, that can be done. They ask to listen to the heart, I ask “What can one otherwise do, when one just drains his mind out of all thoughts”. Is there an alternative?? Why one need to listen to heart, when one can’t control it?? Why not leave everything to our mind and let it take decisions, when it is at the helm of our heart basically. However, heart is a ‘beast’ which is uncontrollable, and does what it likes, not what ‘you’ like. There is a difference between ‘it’ and ‘you’, which may be too difficult to see but too dangerous to ignore.
This post may just keep on continuing, endless matter I would like to share -
Why do break-ups ever happen?? How are relationships formed?? When two entities decide to go together, walk together; is that a decision of their instincts or is there a mind working to bring together two lonely hearts. To me, both the forces work in quick succession. Firstly, to fall for someone is instantaneous which is completely based on heart’s liking for the one. As soon as this happens, the mind starts working to get the two together, which is a long, cumbersome and gradual process.
On the other hand, if we look at the break-ups, it’s the other way round. There is a slurry of thoughts filling in both the minds. The thoughts are churned for a long time, a lot of heat is generated, emotions also sometimes come in between. The things that one won’t have ever thought about his/her partner or would have ever paid heed to, just come rushing in. The thoughts just flood the mind, which lose control of everything and thus, the heart that has been shielded by the mind till now, is bared. “Heart”, then just results in an instantaneous response, which you all may have understood. As soon as heart comes in the open, the break-up occurs.
Thus, ‘Heart’ produces a reaction that may or may not be correct, and the “Mind” need to take up the responsibility, suffer, and work for the decision that has been taken by the “Heart”.
Finally ending it, my mind is tired!!!
I feel that it’s better to listen to “Mind”, and that’s not easy as may seem to be as it need control over one’s instincts. This is the point of view of a “Mind”-supporter, I would wish to have someone from the other side to put his/her views, thoughts…oops, I am sorry…his/her ‘feelings’ and ‘emotions’!!!
Labels: battle, duel, emotions, feelings, heart, mind, Philosophy


16 Comments:
Welcome to blogosphere!
Did a brilliant job with the first post. Do not stop writing.
First things first, welcome to the blogging (read jobless) world.
I beg to differ at various points in your post. To say that "heart" can not take good decisions is wrong. When someone claims that he/she is following his/her heart, it essentially means that he is not able to put a rational argument in its favor. As described in the book "Blink", it draws on past experiences to choose the right path - which is nothing wrong.
And my main point of contention is your claim that when a person chooses to go with the heart sometimes and the mind at others, it sucks the soul out of the person and impairs their ability to take good decisions. On the contrary most of the corporate gurus suggest this path.
Thanks to both ugri and ankit.
@Ankit: I may not have been clear in putting my point, but I never said that "when a person chooses to go with the heart sometimes and the mind at others, it sucks the soul out of the person and impairs their ability to take good decisions." I am in total agreement with your point. I said it's rarely seen that these 2 forces work together, which is obviously the best thing.
I would like to quote what I wrote, " For some, it’s a tough battle between the two forces and if this battle continues for long, it drains the soul out of the person and makes him feel the worst, as if a ‘Dementor’ is sucking his soul." If a person is unable to decide for long as to go with his instincts or his thoughts, then it leaves him very frustrated.
@ Ankit: As for your first point, I may need to read the book 'Blink'. However, I would take this (drawing on past experiences to choose the right path) as the last resort. There may not be anything wrong, but there may be better ways- one of which I feel would be to think and act.
I don't support someone who seems to follow his past experiences to decide upon almost everything, which becomes his trait.
[...] 80beats put an intriguing blog post on Mind vs HeartHere’s a quick excerpt“hearty” people mean that we have developed and evolved because we know what our heart says, while our ancestors never knew that a thing… [...]
Mind Boggling only! (Interesting side thought: Why dont they have a term as Heart Blogging? hmm..)
So *why* did _you_ start writing a blog? Some logical reason as you mentioned......
And one post on LitSoc? :P
Guessing that's in the pipeline.....
Oh and I agree with you on the being prepared, think and act rather than impulsive decisions part(though sometimes they are fun)
@Arun: So u went thru that 1st post quite thoroughly...I didn't expect someone to ask me the reason for writing blog.
The topic I chose has affected me deeply; I have had numerous debates over this with my friends, and was keen to present my viewpoint and know others' as well through their comments. This is something I strongly believe in.
As for a post on LitSoc...thanks for that great idea and reminding me about it...I dunno how I didn't think of that. Of course, my next post will be on LitSoc. But after end sems... :)
Heya Prateek!
Commendable job on the 1st blog. A lot of 'rational thought' seems to have gone into it! :)
My two pence, in the form of two points:-
1. Ankit said it. 'Blink' may help you in understanding what exactly is the much touted 'instinct' all about. As Malcolm Gladwell explains in his famous work, there is a 'structure for spontaneity'. Instinct isn't random. Careful practice/observation and learning over a lot of time helps your mind develop complex structures so that your heart takes a spontaneous decision in a split second, based on, as people say, 'pure instinct'.
Example: How do many people (and probably you, as well) learn to identify correct or otherwise usage of the Queen's language instantly without ever putting much conscious thought and analysis into the process?
How does a basketball expert know exactly at what angle and with what force to throw the ball at the hoop to score a 3-pointer?
Ans: Instinct! The 'heart' at play. But, the structure for the instinct was developed through numerous years of rigorous training & discipline.
Hence, it is usually, a simultaneous interplay of both the powerful forces of heart & mind that gets stuff working, the way it is supposed to work.
2. Rationality: I loved the point about rational thought differentiating medieval and modern times.
However, also note, that wisdom over the ages clearly establish that men (& women!) over the ages haven't exactly been rational creatures. Instead, they have been rationalizing creatures! We tend to develop rationals for anything and everything that suits our point of view. Eventually, as I heard someone say today, "Even subjectivity can be defined subjectively."
Ad infinitum!
:)
Best Luck and Best Warmth
Pratyush
Thanks for your view on my post. I was really looking forward to people putting their points, but didn't expect so many responses so soon.
Now, I 'think' that I really need to read through Malcolm Gladwell's 'Blink', as has been suggested by two of them. Maybe it affects my viewpoint.
However, I beg to differ when you said that "usually, a simultaneous interplay of both the powerful forces of heart & mind that gets stuff working, the way it is supposed to work." I feel the way, it is supposed to work, is rarely taken. A person may take up an instinctive decision or a thoughtful decision, but not a combination of the two.
At certain times, we may not recognize that we are actually facing two forces, as the decision to be taken may not be that significant. For eg.- When one is suffering from cold and cough, and need water to drink. One's heart would still say "Cold Water", as he/she likes it. The mind would ask for "Normal Water". This battle gets over and the decision is reached within a fraction of seconds (based on one's priorities), which we don't even care to notice.
We see the real picture when faced with a problem that is really important. Then we face the real battle and usually, we don't find a mutually agreed upon course of action; and need to decide between the two. For eg- Assume one had a fight with his/her friend. One may know that he/she was wrong, and that he/she shouldn't be pardoned, i.e. "One's MIND at work"; but, if one goes by his/her feelings, one may feel the other way round. The two usually force a person to select one.
@ Pratyush: As for the 2nd point about 'being rational' or 'being rationalizing creatures'! I feel whatever the case may be, both are related to "Thoughts" and "not Feelings" (rational - pure thought process, rationalizing - fitting one's views to some rationale). Whether be it rational or rationalizing, heart is never a part of any of these processes (so we can rule out heart).
By the way, humans would have developed when they acted rationally, and not when they acted as rationalizing beings. The point remains the same, is progress and development related to being rational...is it related to mind?? I feel the answer is Yes.
@ Prateek
Humans acted (and still do so) based on their animal instincts. When we say humans are rationalising, it actually means that humans "reactive" and not "pro-active". I remember telling you this before sometime.
We seek rational in our actions AFTER it is completed. In hindsight a lot more makes sense than otherwise.
btw, I envy you like anything! so many comments :(
After this, I had a long chat/ duel with Ankit, which all the readers of my blog may follow up in my next post.
While reading this blog i really felt good ...and i rarely find these kind of topics.......good one buddy .....
While reading this blog i really felt good ...and i rarely find these kind of topics.......good one buddy ...
Thanks...i really feel good when I read comments like yours'. It really motivates one to write more and more. Keep reading, more to come. :)
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home