Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Welcome to the Hard Truth!!!

Don’t you feel stifled in your environment?? If you are happy in your life and content with what’s going around you, then leave now.


What’s that they say, “For Ignorance is Bliss”. I say - It’s Dangerous.


Is it because you have adapted yourself to the environment?? Isn’t that the best way to survive?? Isn’t it better to be like that – but better for whom?? For you or for the Society?? I don’t think that either you or the Society need to just survive, it’s your LIFE – you need to LIVE it!!!


“Throughout the world…we use the word ‘politics’ to describe the process so well: ‘Poli’ in Latin meaning ‘many’ and ‘tics’ meaning ‘bloodsucking creatures’. Don’t you think that we are among these ‘tics’??Yes, WE are!!! And I learnt this harsh reality after entering IIT. There are many things that I have learnt at IIT the hard way ( :) ), as these were theoretical (all the courses). However, one thing that, I am damn sure, will always remain in my mind as I see it everytime, I feel it everywhere, it’s there always and that is – Regionalism, Politics. Before entering into IIT or for that matter for anyone entering any of the institutes, we sense a feeling of pain and of being cheated, swelling within us, a surge of anger against the people governing the country – ‘POLI-TIC-IANS’. The feeling is justified.


We do feel the same even after coming here – Is the feeling justified now?? One would say, “Why not!! We have become more responsible.” I ask, “Responsible for what??” During institute elections or even elections within the hostel, we see regionalism at its peak. If a Northie wins, it would have been due to Northie majority; and if a Southie (from A.P) wins, it would have been otherwise. Here credentials matter, but only if you are facing a neutral person, who are in minority. Favoritism being shown based on region, is that what we were appealing for to our dear ‘Politicians’. If not, then why are we becoming like them!!! Politics leads to regionalism, and Regionalism, in turn, leads to Regional Politics. It has become a vicious circle – a loop, without a beginning or an end. We are tying a knot, a noose around our necks, strangling ourselves, which will eventually suffocate us to death. We are preparing a Doomsday for ourselves. It may be tough to untie the noose, without a beginning or an end, but I ask, “Why are we looking for its ends, for its causes, for its consequences, when we know it’s infinite?? We can never reach its ends.”


But there has to be some solution. How can we otherwise bring a change in the Indian politics?? Why do you think are politicians not justified in showing favoritism, bringing quota in all the fields, when we are justified in doing the same for some petty, mere posts in our institute itself?? If in your mind an answer pops up, “They are justified”, then I assume – we have lost the battle against corruption, against regionalism, against communalism and against all those evils that we are preaching ourselves. We are being damn bloody hypocrites!!!


As Gandhiji said, “Be the change you wish to see in the world”. Till we wage a battle within ourselves, against us; we can be sure that we won’t be able to win a battle with this government, against those corrupt officials. This is the only solution - to cut the knot in between, where we are standing, to destroy the entire structure – anyways a better structure may be built later easily.


I would like to quote Nandita Das, “Lot of times, or may be always, we try to identify ourselves with something for which we have not at all contributed. We feel proud for something that we have not done – we feel proud for being a Sikh, Hindu, Muslim etc. Ponder for sometime and tell me – What have you done to be one of these. Aren’t there better things to be proud of, where you may have contributed!! ” This idea/ notion is so common – to be proud of your birthplace, family background – so explicit, so much revealed; but yet so hidden. Why? Because we are afraid of losing our identity, why do we need to sweat out our body for something, when we already have a readymade substitute for it!!!


We crib over National politics, when majority of us ‘Don’t Even Vote’. Why don’t we raise a voice against the internal politics, the game being played at a much lower level? Remember, we do ‘Vote For This’!!! How is the statement then justified, “Your vote counts”?? Is it just for the sake of counting?? Why is our vote not changing the political scene within our local boundaries??


Think over this. A song from movie “Rann” truly depicts the state of affairs in India, however it asks “Vidhata(God) to save India”. I beg to differ – it’s us or no one else.






Labels: , , , , ,

16 Comments:

Anonymous Virgin said...

Nice post. Meaningful and racy. Great original observation.
But I beg to differ in two aspects.
i) Regionalism in IIT. That's what you choose. You choose to be 'regional'istic or not... Nobody forces you. Cuz you choose your friends!!
ii) Why not be proud of being a Hindu or of family background??
Though I am an atheist, I am proud I am an Hindu one at that, because it allows me to choose my own belief instead of forcing me into something. Because its based more on the way of life I lead than the God I believe (or whether or not I believe!!)

May 13, 2009 at 6:37 PM  
Anonymous oval said...

I didn't want to just bring up Regionalism in 'IIT', that too IIT Madras. It's just that I have been here for past 4 years; I know it's the same everywhwere, and in all colleges. If not regionalism elsewhere, it may be communalism, but there is one or the other evil - dividing the people, growing everywhere.

I agree when you say that it's up to us to choose - and that's my whole point. When I am asking people to think over this, it means they have a choice. However, I would like to ask you, "Are majority of the people here not 'regional'istic? Or don't they try to be so??" I am sure no one can deny that.

And, your second point: The way you lead your life depends on you. It's not at all related to who you are - Hindu, Muslim or Sikh or for that matter anyone else.
It's not that you were able to choose the way of your life because you are a Hindu. As you said in your first point, it's 'one's choice'!!! No one can force you - neither a person nor a religion. You want to be based 'more on the way of life you lead' - is your decision. Tell me, "Do all Hindus think alike? Do they pride themselves because of the same reason??". When they are proud of being Hindu for different reasons, don't you think it's not the religion but one's own thinking that is playing a role in this. They try to relate themselves to religion; why not relate it to themselves!!!

Be proud of yourself, your decision; and not your religion.

May 14, 2009 at 12:03 AM  
Anonymous Ankit Ashok said...

Good one!

Humans have some difficulty in shifting from what they are used to. So people from the north (who are used to hindi) tend to have more friends who are nothies. And all of these friends will tend to have more of northie friends. So when a person runs for elections, he will get more votes from northies (friends and friends of friends).

I dont see it as regional 'favoritism '.

PS- Your mention of "Ignorance is bliss" reminds me of something that happened to me a few weeks back. I mistook "Solren Solren" to be the name of a person when it actually meant "will tell, will tell" in Tamil.

May 14, 2009 at 3:14 PM  
Anonymous oval said...

@ Ankit: I don't understand, how can you try to justify this!!!

"He will get more votes from northies", I may agree.
However, you may agree that many close and political friends are made during elections. Candidates try to reach the most influential people in the institute - through their regional linkings, and if that is not possible, then through their credentials, which is often difficult.

Regional Politics is the first option. Why is it so that usually there are 2 candidates standing for a post, belonging to different regions? If a candidate is unanimous, then why is that a person, from the other region, after a lot of coaxing by you know who all, stands against him - his only credential being his belonging to a region. Why do we say, "Oh! 2 Northies are standing against a Gult...ob, Gult will win." Or the other way round, why is that so?? And why don't we call the candidates by their names, why do we relate them to a region!! I hope this statement clears all doubts - shows that we vote based on regions, if not then at least we assume that others will be voting according to that. And sometimes, this influences us, leading us to follow our region, and such thinking completes whatever was remaining of Regionalism.

When you say friends vote for a candidate, their friends vote - I agree. But why should "their friends' friends and their friends' friends' friends and so on" should vote for him. How are they related to the candidate, if this is not regionalism, then I would term it as 'utter foolishness' - at least regionalism has some basis and justification.

I hope you don't justify even this, coming from a hostel, famous for Regional Politics Gods.

B/W nice PS. That was good. :)

May 14, 2009 at 5:10 PM  
Anonymous Ankit Ashok said...

abe tu to serious ho gaya yaar ..

hostel ka frustration (?) mere pe kyon nikal raha hai?

When you dont know anything about a certain person, how do u refer to them?Dont you refer to them with the very little you know about them? Dont you say "Oo, that guy who was wearing pink the other day?" or dont you say "All french people are romantic"?

We are hardwired to find co-relations, associations - so that its easier for us to remember/refer them - even if it means stereotyping the person. The same happens here.

PS- the PS was not hilarious for me then. :(

May 14, 2009 at 5:41 PM  
Anonymous Virgin said...

This is getting way too serious... :P

May 14, 2009 at 6:19 PM  
Anonymous oval said...

Hehe...both of you are not among them who I want to target, so may be you both are seeing the things as I see, or as I want to see.

@Virgin: By the way, this was meant to be serious. I am sorry if I have hurt anyone's sentiments.

@Ankit: It's if you know very little about them or a lot about them. No offense meant, but taking your eg. itself - If I say to you , "Biharis are ___", you may have understood what I want to point at. Don't you get angry over that?? When I say that, I am trying to form an opinion about that region. I would relate you with that opinion. And no offense, this I is not 'I', but some general I.

Similarly, when you say, "Northie wins" - it doesn't mean, "Oh...that guy who's a Northie". When we say that, it's in a different sense. I hope you agree.

May 14, 2009 at 6:52 PM  
Anonymous Kumar Pratyush said...

I like this post. Good work. However, I did notice a thread of deep angst through the words that you chose like 'Bloody hypocrite', and the Rann trailer of course.

Plus, no major criticism or cribbing either because of two reasons:-

1. I liked the overall message, the honest intent, and the good effort at objectivity.

2. Am too bored at office, and want to make an exit now.

Also, I think you may like to have a look at a post that I made on my Blog quite some time ago. Its called 'On Non-Conformity'.
I could relate to your thought process in many ways!

Write as much as you can. It is often good for individual and societal health! :)

May 14, 2009 at 11:16 PM  
Anonymous oval said...

As you said, you notice deep angst in my words - I really feel that people need to come out of their anesthetized lives.

The Rann song has been banned and deleted from the movie, most probably. I agree that RGV may have done it for publicity, but isn't that right - leave the reason, see the result. If people in India need to be stirred up, there is need of something radical.

Read your article, 'On Non-Conformity'. That was really well written, without such words and still communicating similar feelings. You too keep on writing such stuff. It may not mean to all, but it may mean to some.

May 15, 2009 at 1:01 AM  
Anonymous Prakhar said...

I have one question was your southie guy so much better then northie guy that northie people were wrong in voting for northie ?? or vice versa......
We have been like this since always....It's always my people, my clan ......I know people should change that's nice for society, for country etc. etc. but they haven't for past tens of centuries and they wont.

My point is if two almost equal are contesting and in any case I wont get affected...neither of them has done anything which would make one stand out compared to other..their policies are same, then why not vote for one based on religion,community or whatever ...... for eg take BJP or Congress both have performed equally well then why not just vote based on religion or whatever crap....The problem is not that people should change...the problem is you should have leaders that should make people change, If it's modi vs manmohan, mayavati vs mulayam , head vs tail then I don't care... I would choose head because I'm Leo(Lion connection)...

And if leaders who know the fact that everyone is equal here , people might vote based on religion and community and still they dont garner support based on their religion or community then I think they are the biggest fools and kicked out for missing such an opportunity. You can't be a politician if you miss opportunites

May 15, 2009 at 5:00 AM  
Anonymous oval said...

My reply is there in the post itself, and you have already replied to the comment in your comment itself.

Oval: If in your mind an answer pops up, “They are justified”, then I assume – we have lost the battle against corruption, against regionalism, against communalism and against all those evils that we are preaching ourselves.

Prakhar: I know people should change that’s nice for society, for country etc. etc. but they haven’t for past tens of centuries and they wont ('lost the battle').

May 15, 2009 at 5:23 AM  
Anonymous oval said...

I think we need to still fight for it. However, the point raised is good. See it's not about 'so much better', but even 'a bit better'. Anyways, I don't think that matters, because majority of us don't try to search for answers as to who's better.

I don't know if you are well aware of all the politics scenario, but generally one sets one's mind to vote for some candidate. If you ask what made him/her take that decision, he/she may be at a loss of words. I ask you, "Why do you think Modi and Manmohan are equal ?" I am sure if there is a debate over this, one of them will surely emerge out as a winner against the other.

Even in our institutes, not everyone knows about the candidate - but all of them vote. This was the case with me, but I abstained. It may seem stupid, as I should have tried to learn more. However, I am damn sure that a lot of us would have voted because a senior would have asked to do so.

On the voting day, there are opposite factions viewing each and every voter, trying to pull their votes in favor of their candidates. They try to coax them - it's like a child's game.

Everyone knows that it won't matter to them if they vote for a person belonging to their region - it's not as if the candidate, if wins, will turn the tables around. But still, everyone votes in the same manner; leave out those who really benefit by doing so.

There is a need for change. Voting is not a game - think of a deserving candidate who loses because of such politics.

In a hurry, as net goes off at 12. So...

May 15, 2009 at 5:32 AM  
Anonymous Prakhar said...

But the position they hold is so huge that you can safely ignore those marginal differences. This difference is not worth the trouble and time you have to spend. They all have same policies about farmers, industrialization, road, bridges etc . Is the benefit really worth all the research you have to do ?

If it's some one like Kalam vs Patil..too completely different people, completely different background, different ideologies and policies then we should vote based on who we think is better instead of religion or region. When you can actually comprehend the differences ...communist vs capitalist sort of...

But if you give me 100 cows and ask to vote for one..I wont take trouble to find out which one gives a litre or 2 more then others...I would just vote for the cow of my neighbourhood.


I know it's nice if we make informed decisions and it'll force political parties to have worthy members instead of criminals. But I think initiative has to come from leader's side. Unless and until we have Obama vs McCain sort of clashes .......I dont think all the research, time is worth the benefit.

May 15, 2009 at 6:22 AM  
Anonymous oval said...

It's not all about politics, nor is it about regionalism or communalism in politics. The post may seem so because I can easily relate to these, having stayed in IIT Madras for 4 years.

It may be so that all these things were not so evident at places where you have lived or are living. Generally, regionalism, communalism are not seen explicitly if there is a majority of people belonging to one faction. However, if you wish to see all this, come to IIT M. Here, both the groups are in almost equal number.

If you wish to believe that such things don't exist in India, then I seriously feel that you should visit more of India (may be IIT M ;)). Anyways, I will be coming home soon, my bro...will talk to you in detail.

May 15, 2009 at 3:51 PM  
Anonymous karan syal said...

"Why don’t we raise a voice against the internal politics, the game being played at a much lower level? "

@ oval : it requires balls to do what you are asking! In IIT people can either talk loudly, put pseud, impress people and do nothing! or they can whisper to there room neighbor, bitch for a while, laugh about it and again end up doing nothing! there are very few people who will stay silent and do something!

To vote for the right guy requires balls ( unbiased thinking ), but here we vote based on whose supporting whom, "The Deals" , if you are a part of those or not, you have your own QMS cordship/ Spons coreship at stake or not! . Voting on manifesto's is also rare i would say.

Trust me we are a funny bunch here in IIT :) , and most of votes are based on deals irrespective of who is a northie/southie. Its the insecurities in opposite camps that are exploited the most, and its the spineless who get insecure!

Its not bad being in politics i wud say, but its definably bad being in politics for your own motive ( read as QMS/ Security/ Pro Show coordship - apparently the most desirous coordships!) and yes u can be in politics for the common good i.e if you believe in such a practice!

May 16, 2009 at 8:37 PM  
Anonymous oval said...

I agree with you that "The Deals" play an important role in politics. However, an important point to notice is - Is the majority involved in this?

I feel that it's not so. There are very few of us who aspire to be a coord or core, relative to the number of voters. And, 'The Deals' are made between these minority, who wish to take up responsibilities in future, and the candidate. These responsible people are quite influential within their groups.

Assuming these 'to be coords and cores' are justified in playing this game, for their own benefits; but, according to me, this bargain is usually like, "I promise you the support and votes of all my hostel ___(northie or southi) junta, if you promise to give me ___(coreship etc.)." These traders are quite confident about their influence and are sure that they will be able to pull in all the votes belonging to their group. Now, this again boils down to usually one's regional influence.

So, the basis of all these deals is also regional influence or "Regionalism". More is one's regional influence, more is his/her political influence.

Also, apart from the politics, it seems to me that "Regionalism" has creeped, or rather has always been there, in our daily lives at our Institute. Why to go beyond it, to the politics, when answer lies in front of us.

May 17, 2009 at 8:43 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home